Free guide

Are you actually ready to localize — or just translating?

83% of software companies say international expansion is a priority. Only 56% feel ready to execute it. This is the gap in between — and how to tell which side of it you're on.

Why the readiness gap exists

Most teams don't fail at localization because of bad translation — they fail because translation was the only step. Readiness means having a process: a consistent glossary, a quality-check step, and a way to catch errors before they reach a customer who can't tell you something's wrong.

Source: Nimdzi 100, 2025 · Crowdin State of Localization, 2026

A quick self-assessment

0%

0% — Nothing ticked yet

Tick what's actually true today, not what you're planning. The point isn't a good score — it's knowing which gaps you're carrying into your next release.

Want real proof, not a self-score? Send us a page — we'll grade it like an actual audit.

What "ready" actually looks like

01

AI speed without losing quality

02

A human check on every single segment, not spot-checks

03

A record of what was reviewed, in a language you can actually read

See where your own content stands

Send us a page or file and we'll show you — with the same severity-graded format from our Sample QA Report — exactly where the gaps are.